Anti-spike antibody level is associated with the risk of clinical progression among subjects hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia: results from a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike (anti-S) may confer protection against symptomatic COVID-19. Whether their level predicts progression among those with COVID-19 pneumonia remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess predictors of anti-S levels and whether anti-S titer is associated with death or mechanical ventilation (MV). Adults hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia between July 2021 and July 2022 were enrolled if anti-S had been measured within 72 h of admission. Predictors of anti-S level were explored using multivariable quantile regression. The association between anti-S levels and 30-day death/MV was investigated via multivariable logistic regression. Analyses were stratified by vaccine status. RESULTS: The median anti-S level was 1370 BAU/ml in 328 vaccinated and 15.5 BAU/ml in 206 unvaccinated individuals. Among the vaccinated, shorter symptom duration (p = 0.001), hematological malignancies (p = 0.002), and immunosuppressive therapy (p = 0.004) were associated with lower anti-S levels. In the unvaccinated group, symptom duration was the only predictor of anti-S levels (p < 0.001). After 30 days, 134 patients experienced death or MV. Among vaccinated individuals, higher anti-S levels correlated significantly with lower death/MV risk (per log2 increase, OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.81-0.97), irrespective of age and solid malignancies. Among unvaccinated, a marginally protective effect was observed (OR 0.86, 95%CI 0.73-1.01), independent of age, immunosuppressive therapy, and diabetes. Adjustment for monoclonal antibody treatment strengthened the association (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.68-0.96). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that levels of anti-S antibodies can predict critical or fatal outcomes in COVID-19 pneumonia patients, regardless of vaccination. Whether anti-S Ab could guide risk assessment and vaccination boosting merits further evaluation.

Heart transplantation as salvage treatment of intractable infective endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: For infective endocarditis (IE) with extensive perivalvular lesions or end-stage cardiac failure, heart transplantation (HT) may be the last resort. METHODS: We retrospectively collected all cases of HT for IE within the International Collaboration on Endocarditis (ICE) network. RESULTS: Between 1991 and 2021, 20 patients (5 women, 15 men), median age 50 years [interquartile range, 29-61], underwent HT for IE in Spain (n = 9), France (n = 6), Switzerland (n = 2), Colombia, Croatia, and USA (n = 1). IE affected prosthetic (n = 10), and native valves (n = 10), primarily aortic (n = 11) and mitral (n = 6). The main pathogens were oral streptococci (n = 8), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 5), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 2). The major complications included heart failure (n = 18), peri-annular abscess (n = 10), and prosthetic valve dehiscence (n = 4). Eighteen patients had previous cardiac surgery for this episode of IE, and four were on circulatory support before HT (left ventricular assist-device and extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, 2 patients each). The median time interval between first symptoms of IE and HT was 44.5 days [22-91.5]. The main post-HT complication was acute rejection (n = 6). Seven patients died (35%), four during the first month post-HT. Thirteen (81%) of the 16 patients discharged from the hospital survived with a median follow-up of 35.5 months [4-96.5] after HT, and no relapse of IE. CONCLUSIONS: IE is not an absolute contraindication for HT: Our case series and the literature review support that HT may be considered as a salvage treatment in highly-selected patients with intractable IE.

Infective Endocarditis Related to Unusual Microorganisms: A Prospective Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Increased access to heart valves through early surgery and progress in molecular microbiology have reduced the proportion of infective endocarditis (IE) with no microbiological documentation and increased the proportion of IE associated with unusual microorganisms. METHODS: We performed an ancillary study of a large prospective population-based survey on IE. Unusual-microorganism IE was defined as definite IE (Duke-Li criteria) due to microorganisms other than streptococci, staphylococci, or enterococci. RESULTS: Of 471 cases of documented IE, 46 (9.8%) were due to unusal microorganisms; the following were involved in >1 case: Candida albicans (n = 4), Cutibacterium acnes (n = 4), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 3), Cardiobacterium hominis (n = 3), and Coxiella burnetii (n = 2). Cases were documented with blood cultures (n = 37, 80.4%), heart valve polymerase chain reaction (PCR; n = 5), heart valve culture (n = 2), PCR on vertebral biopsy (n = 1), or serology (n = 1). As compared with IE due to staphylococci, streptococci, or enterococci (n = 420), IE due to unusual microorganisms occurred more frequently in patients with previously known heart disease (69.0% vs 44.3%; P = .002), prosthetic valve (40.5% vs 18.1%; P = .0006), longer duration of fever (mean, 35.1 ± 46.8 days vs 12.5 ± 17.8; P = .003), and who were more often nosocomial (38.1% vs 20.2%; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, 9.8% of IE cases were due to unusual microorganisms, with a predominance of anaerobes, yeast, and gram-negative bacilli. As compared with IE related to staphylococci, streptococci, or enterococci, IE cases related to unusual microorganisms were associated with previously known heart disease, prosthetic valve, longer duration of fever, and nosocomial acquisition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ORCID 0000-0003-3617-5411.